Misaligned metrics
Vanity metrics like viewability and CTR are cheap to track, so brands lean on them, buyers are held to them, and publishers chase them. This normalises intrusive, click-focused ad experiences that erode trust.
Picnic's first annual report on how quality is defined and measured across the open web: the challenges fuelling ad waste, the PIQ methodology, and the UK's ten highest-quality domains.
Two quick details and we'll open the report in a new tab.
We use your details to send related Picnic content. Unsubscribe anytime.
The industry has struggled with these for over a decade. Together, they push nearly a quarter of programmatic spend into waste.
Vanity metrics like viewability and CTR are cheap to track, so brands lean on them, buyers are held to them, and publishers chase them. This normalises intrusive, click-focused ad experiences that erode trust.
Made-for-advertising sites slip through broad ad buys with poor content and excessive placements. Blunt block lists give a false sense of safety, and MFA operators cycle through domain names in days.
Every buyer balances cost, quality and scale differently, but nobody admits the trade-off. Opaque, one-size-fits-all decisions stop buyers from ever reaching their own optimal blend.
PIQ breaks quality into 100+ signals, grouped into three indexes (Experience, Media Opportunity and Risk Profile) and combines them into a single score from 1–100. Picnic's threshold for quality is 30.
The Media Quality Report shows how the industry lost its grip on quality, and how PIQ takes the subjectivity out of it, so your programmatic spend finally drives real outcomes.
Download the report
Research
1 in 3 domains fail media quality thresholds.
Read article
Industry
The threat of MFA sites: why quality is key to protecting your brand.
Read article
Research
The ad waste buckets: a nuanced approach to measuring ad waste.
Read article
Opinion
Signal washing: the ad industry’s greenwashing problem.
Read article